-
Redemption
Maybe my plantar fasciitis,
newly flared up,
is karma for the time I stole
some shampoo and conditioner
(and probably some nail polish)
From Walmart
(okay, that happened more than once)
So, one flash of heel pain for each stolen good?
How does it work?I don’t know when I stopped stealing
(I didn’t find God)
(in fact, I lost him)
But I must have had some moral shoulder-sitter
or at least ingrained capitalism
telling me “hey now, that’s enough”
because I stopped for goodOnce I asked a new date
“What’s the worst thing you’ve ever done?”
(you know, icebreaker)
His answer was probably a 3 out of 10 on the cosmic evil scale
& when he turned the question back on me
I couldn’t think of anything that bad
but I know that if we as a species are good at anything
it is justifying our shitty actions
so maybe I am a shitty person
but I just don’t know it
so I asked my friend later what she thought the worst thing I’d ever done was
And she couldn’t really think of anythingI finally got back to my date with “I used to steal a lot”
which is boring
but I added that maybe my heel pain
is karma from a past life
a more interesting life
where I committed tax fraudOr maybe it is the leftover vestiges of karma
from a truly terrible tyrannical life
hundreds of years ago
which required several lifetimes to deal out
and now the arc of my soul has swung toward “neutral – good”
because my soul is fucking tired
of being evil
maybe I was Genghis Khan -
From destruction… creation
The wise say that you chose your circumstances.
You chose your parents,
you chose to be born in your body,
you chose your life.
I don’t know how it works.
Maybe it’s karma.
Maybe my past choices did the choosing,
did the causing,
which are now affecting.
I look at the last text I received from my father.
Why’d I choose him? I wonder, pitifully.
But then I look at my hand, holding the phone,
and I see him in it.
And my mother,
and the river of ancestors
pooling in me,
who sculpted my hand
like the ridges of a canyon.
And I feel love for this hand,
for my ancestors,
for my father.
The wise say that time is a circle.
An infinite flux of yuga cycles,
ages of creation and destruction.
I look at the last text from my father.
Would I choose him again?
My hand trembles a bit.
I would, I would.
-
Human Revolution Through Compassion and Interbeing
I have become disillusioned with politics as a vehicle for change.
The pendulum swing from one party’s policies to the other is constant and self-negating. As soon as one party gains power, changes made are swiftly undone, and those undone changes will be re-done when the other party re-gains power. It’s a circle. It’s an ouroboros, but not a cool one that you see tattooed on a hot person. It’s chaotic and ultimately accomplishes nothing.
Adin Strauss, the General Director of the Soka Gakkai International USA (SGI-USA), a Buddhist organization, held a virtual lecture August 13th. In response to a question from the audience, Strauss said that what’s urgent is not more political action but rather the transformation of the life state of the humans who make up this country and this world.
Transforming the life state of people can be accomplished through dialogue. Daisaku Ikeda, president of the SGI, is passionate about dialogue as a vehicle for change. Through dialogue, we can achieve a human revolution. In my understanding, the human revolution that we SGI Buddhists talk about is the cumulative effect of individual humans who feel supported, heard, and respected, and go on to show compassion, support, and respect to their fellow human beings. Each human being, after all, has inherent dignity. Compassion ripples outward; Ikeda says that “human revolution is opening your eyes wide and looking beyond your ordinary concerns, striving for and dedicating your actions to something higher, deeper, and broader.” Humans have the ability to change and to constantly strive for self-improvement. We should all probably take a long, hard look at ourselves and see what is not serving us and what we should sacrifice for the wellbeing of others.
Joanna Macy, in her wonderful books World as Lover, World as Self and Active Hope, speaks of two weapons that are needed to combat the evil of the world. The weapons are not items that cause bodily damage and destruction. Rather, they are things we can all cultivate: compassion and insight of our interbeing. Many years ago, a friend of Joanna’s in India told her about these weapons, which are the solutions to strife in the ancient Shambhala warrior prophecy:
“Now is the time the Shambhala warriors go into training. They train in the use of two implements. One is compassion and the other is insight into the radical interdependence of all phenomena. You need both. You need the compassion because that provides the fuel to move you out where you need to be to do what you need to do. That means not being afraid of the suffering of your world. When you’re not afraid to be with that pain, then nothing can stop you. You can be and do what you’re meant to. But by itself that implement is very hot – it can burn you out. So you need that other tool – you need the insight into the radical interconnectivity at the heart of existence, the web of life, our deep ecology. When you have that, then you know that this is not a battle between good guys and bad guys. You know that the line between good and evil runs through the landscape of every human heart. And you know that we are so interwoven in the web of life that even the smallest act, with clear intention, has repercussions through the whole web beyond your capacity to see. But that’s a little cool; maybe even a little abstract. You need the heat of the compassion – the interplay between compassion and wisdom.”
“Compassion and interbeing” has become a mantra for me when I am faced with having a difficult conversation with someone I disagree with. It is a reminder that the other person is another version of me, saddled with difficulties and challenges, just trying to make it through life. People have good reasons for doing what they do— we are all excellent at justifying our own actions. And so, the person in front of me has good reasons for believing what they believe. They are my sister or brother or sibling. They are a fellow Earthling. Can I get out of my own head and put that sentiment foremost? Can I disagree with them and also love and respect them? Carl Sagan said, “If a human disagrees with you, let him live. In a hundred billion galaxies, you will not find another.”
After a SGI discussion meeting or reading a Joanna Macy book, it is easy for me to feel confident about my ability to plunge into a difficult conversation and listen to another person with deep respect for them and their opinion. However, more often than not during such a conversation, I feel not the fire of compassion but instead the fire of anger and impatience. Conversations with family members who deny the reality and seriousness of climate change come to mind. I can enter their homes full of resolve to have a productive conversation in which I share facts with compassion, but I usually end up leaving drained and frustrated from my inability to get any minds to change. Their stubbornness undermines my ability to feel compassion for them in those moments.
Anger and impatience stem from my lesser self. They are a product of ego and the desire to prove not only my worthiness, but my superiority. The desire to change someone’s mind also originates in ego. My greater self recognizes anger and impatience for what they are and does not wish to cultivate them.
Beliefs are deeply rooted and become cherished, integral parts of our self-identities. People tend to fiercely guard their beliefs, and when they are challenged, a shield of rejection is raised. We simply don’t want to hear opposing viewpoints or even facts to erode our cherished beliefs for fear that the foundation we have built ourselves on will crumble. But what if we could understand that our beliefs should not be our foundation? Our obligations to each other should be our foundation. Without respect for one another, without hearing each other out, without having compassion for our neighbors, we don’t have a civilized society. We will be quick to destroy each other if we are not willing to listen to one another.
It is not easy. It will take time. It will take patience. But it is a challenge worth undertaking. Can we love our crooked neighbors with our crooked hearts? Can I recognize that my conservative neighbor has his head up his ass, but he is not unreachable? There is a darkness in the human heart that is uncomfortable to acknowledge— a part that needs healing. It exists in all of us. What if we treated earnest, compassionate, yet difficult dialogue not as a chore, but as an opportunity to practice the one thing that will ensure the continuation of our species?
-
Bowing to buddha-nature
“I heard that somebody threw a beer at Ted Cruz,” James* said in his rich southern accent. “Now, that’s just about the worst thing you could do to somebody. I don’t care who he is; that man is a human being.”
I looked at the faces in the Zoom room: four squares of nodding heads, plus James’s square, partly obstructed by a virtual background he had asked his granddaughter to get rid of (she had been unsuccessful). We were a motley crew: we had representatives from the age groups of 70s, 60s, 30s, and 20s, and a near-even mixture of men and women. On other days, we had Asian and Indian friends among us, but today we were mostly white, with the exception of James, who is Black. Our uniting factor was that we were all practitioners of SGI Buddhism, come together for a study meeting. My favorite thing about these study meetings is that the diversity of the organization really shines through in them. I relish the opportunity to hear from elders, who typically take my breath away with the wisdom they’ve gained from being a human for decades longer than I have.
“Now, I can think of few people I agree with less than Ted Cruz,” continued James. “I don’t like the man at all. But I would still bow to him. I would bow to his buddha-nature. I would bow to the enlightened potential of anyone I don’t agree with.”
He went on to say that we need people with different opinions. If we didn’t have people giving us a reason to fight, we would not have anything to fight for.
In “Be Here Now,” Ram Dass said:
“Hippies create police
Police create hippies
If you’re in polarity, you’re creating opposites
You can only protest effectively when you love the person whose ideas you are protesting against as much as you love yourself.”
He also said,
“The only way out of that is to take the poles of every set of opposites and see the way in which they are one. And: if you can get into that place where you see the interrelatedness of everything, and you see the oneness in it all, then no longer are you attached to your polarized position.”
The answer is not throwing a beer at someone you don’t like. The answer is dialogue. We have a duty to talk to our fellow humans, who are endowed with buddha-naturejust as we are. I think that most of the time we are talking only to those who identify with the groups we identify with. That doesn’t cause a spark. There is no friction and there is no fire.
“If a man gives way to all his desires, or panders to them, there will be no inner struggle in him, no ‘friction’, no fire. But if, for the sake of attaining a definite aim, he struggles with the desires that hinder him— he will then create a fire which will gradually transform his inner world into a single whole.”
Ouspensky, quoted by Ram Dass in “Be Here Now”I have a desire to be right. With politics, with religion, with everything I have an opinion about. I want to be right. I desire group membership; identification with others. My ego longs to identify with a cause, and people, I respect. It longs to be involved in the correct course of action so it can tell itself that it is doing a good job and that it is correct and that it is worthy.
But what if I am already worthy despite my identifications? What if the real difference between groups in opposite poles— Republican and Democrat, hippie and police, etcetera— is simply the group identification one chooses? Nothing deeper than that?
Buddha-nature, the capacity for boundless compassion and wisdom, exists in us all, even people we don’t like. People are worthy of respect whether you think they are or not.
My challenge to myself is to bow to the buddha-nature in a human I don’t like, and engage them in dialogue. There may be more commonality between us than either of us would ever imagine beyond the layers of complex labels and identities we’ve mummified ourselves with.
As a privileged white woman, it may be easy for me to pull the “we’re all one” card. I have experienced relatively few challenges as a result of the body I find myself in, although I do harbor a handful of marginalized identities. I do not mean to trivialize the real suffering that people like police and racists cause. Finding common ground with a fellow human does not excuse them from any suffering they have caused. Racists are not people I want to make friends with. And yet, if racists are shown no friction to their beliefs, the fire of transformation will not be possible for them. If they are not challenged— and challenged in a calm way, through dialogue, so they do not immediately close their ears— how will they ever recognize the buddha-nature in those they cast evil toward?
How will they ever recognize their own buddha-nature— that underlying capacity for goodness that exists in all of us, even the very worst of us?
What if recognizing that takes their breath away?
*I used a pseudonym since I did not ask for permission to share this person’s words.
